Snack War Heats Up: Gujarat Brand Takes McDonald’s to Court
Snack War Heats Up: Gujarat Brand Takes McDonald’s to Court
A Gujarat-based snack company has filed a lawsuit against McDonald’s over the use of the 'Mc' prefix. The legal battle raises questions about trademark rights and brand identity in India.
McDonald's, a multinational fast-food chain, and McPatel Foods Private Limited, an Indian company, are engaged in a legal battle. The Gujarat-based food manufacturer has been accused by McDonald's of using the "Mc" prefix, which it says is misleadingly similar to its well-known worldwide branding. In response, McPatel claims that McDonald's is making unfounded threats.

McPatel Foods has strongly refuted the accusations, claiming that it has not registered its identity under any corporate name or trade style that suggests or capitalizes on a relationship with McDonald's. They claim that McPatel Foods is a registered MSME and a legally organized Indian company that works in the processed food industry.

McPatel claims that their trademark differs from McDonald's and that the lawsuit is motivated by "trade envy," intended to harm a domestic business. They emphasize that during the examination phase, their registration application was approved and promoted without any issues. McPatel argues that McDonald's cannot claim a monopoly across all industries and maintains that there is no proof of consumer deceit or confusion. The trademark registration dispute is still pending and has not been settled.

Under Section 142 of the Trademarks Act, 1999, McPatel Foods filed the lawsuit in the Ahmedabad Rural Court, claiming
"groundless threats of legal proceedings."
In March 2024, McPatel applied to register the "McPatel" brand for food items such as sauces, noodles, and bakery snacks. On August 27, McDonald's subsequently submitted an objection to this application to the Indian Trademarks Registry.
McDonald's argues that McPatel's name and logo are similar to its own "Mc" family of trademarks, which have been well-known worldwide since the 1970s in more than a hundred countries, and India since 1996. McDonald's claims that McPatel's use is an intentional adoption to obtain an unfair advantage, which could cause confusion and damage the reputation of its well-known trademarks.